Purpose This retrospective study evaluated the clinical outcomes of combined phacoemulsification, implantation of 1 of 3 types of advanced intraocular lenses (IOLs) with multifocality, and pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling in patients with cataract and ERM. Outcomes were compared with those in age-matched controls who underwent phacoemulsification with the same IOL alone.
Methods A total of 70 eyes were included: 35 eyes underwent combined surgery, and 35 served as controls. In each group, 15 eyes received an advanced monofocal IOL (Tecnis Eyhance ICB00), 15 received a hybrid diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDoF) IOL (Tecnis Symfony ZXR00), and five received a hybrid refractive EDoF IOL (Precizon Presbyopic NVA).
Results All groups showed significant visual improvement by 6 months postoperatively. Eyes that received hybrid diffractive EDoF IOLs and underwent combined surgery showed significantly worse mean corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected intermediate visual acuity, and corrected near visual acuity at 3 months than control eyes, but these outcomes improved to levels comparable to those of control eyes by 6 months. Eyes that received hybrid refractive EDoF IOLs showed similar early delays; however, interpretation was limited by the small sample size.
Conclusion Overall, combined surgery was safe and effective, although early visual recovery may be delayed in eyes receiving EDoF IOLs. These findings suggest that advanced monofocal and EDoF IOLs may be considered in selected patients with ERM; however, the results should be interpreted cautiously because of the retrospective design and limited sample size.
With ongoing advancements in surgical techniques and intraocular lens (IOLs) technologies, cataract surgery is increasingly recognized as a form of refractive procedure aimed at enhancing overall visual performance rather than being viewed solely as lens extraction. In parallel with this shift, a growing number of aging individuals with myopia are actively seeking spectacle independence following cataract surgery. The selection of IOLs for presbyopia correction in patients with myopia presents distinct clinical and refractive challenges, necessitating careful preoperative evaluation and individualized surgical planning. In this review, the author summarizes current evidence regarding the use of various IOLs, including monofocal, enhanced monofocal, extended depth-of-focus, and multifocal IOLs, for presbyopia correction in myopic patients and discusses key considerations involved in selecting the most appropriate IOL for this specific population.
Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the visual quality of extended depth of focus (EDOF), enhanced monofocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients with retinal disease.
Methods In total, 103 eyes from 93 patients (group 1: enhanced monofocal ICB00, n=36; group 2: EDOF ZXR00, n=36; group 3: monofocal ZCB00, n=31) were retrospectively enrolled. Uncorrected and corrected near visual acuity (UNVA, CNVA), intermediate visual acuity (UIVA, CIVA), and distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), and satisfaction scores were assessed before and after surgery.
Results The postoperative UDVA, CDVA, and MRSE of the three groups were better than the preoperative data, respectively (P<0.05). The UIVA of group 1 (0.13±0.12 logMAR) and 2 (0.10±0.11) was significantly better than that of groups 3 (0.25±0.15) (P<0.05). The UNVA of group 2 (0.18±0.12) was significantly better than that of groups 1 (0.32±0.20) and 3 (0.45±0.26; P<0.05). The UDVA of patients with macular edema and macular holes was insignificantly lower than that of epiretinal membranes and high myopia. The overall satisfaction of group 1 (1.58±0.81) and 2 (1.46±0.75) was significantly better than that of groups 3 (1.83±0.97; P<0.05).
Conclusion EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs were associated with better intermediate and near vision than monofocal IOLs in patients with retinal disease. However, monofocal IOLs are recommended in patients with macular edema and macular holes, unlike patients with epiretinal membranes and high myopia.
Epiretinal membrane (ERM), one of the most common retinal diseases, can cause various degrees of visual disturbance, reduced contrast sensitivity, and metamorphopsia. ERM is not infrequently encountered during preoperative evaluations for cataract surgery, and selecting an appropriate intraocular lens (IOL) according to the location and stage of ERM is necessary in order to improve visual outcomes and patients’ satisfaction. This review summarizes the application of various IOLs—such as multifocal, extended depth of focus, and enhanced monofocal IOLs—in eyes with ERM, and discusses the selection of an appropriate IOL.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens options in myopic eyes undergoing cataract surgery Sang Beom Han Insights in Cataract and Refractive Surgery.2026; 11(1): 1. CrossRef